Difference between revisions of "Talk:6.15 The French Mistake"
From Super-wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
removed link to 7 Jan spoilers as there is controversy over whether they were legitimately obtained. --[[User:Missyjack|Missyjack]] 03:20, 7 January 2011 (UTC) | removed link to 7 Jan spoilers as there is controversy over whether they were legitimately obtained. --[[User:Missyjack|Missyjack]] 03:20, 7 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
:According to the owner of supernaturallocations.com, [http://twitter.com/#!/KJNeely KJ Neely], they were. Biased source, I know, but I'm inclined to believe her. —[[User:EllieMurasaki|EllieMurasaki]] 03:37, 7 January 2011 (UTC) | :According to the owner of supernaturallocations.com, [http://twitter.com/#!/KJNeely KJ Neely], they were. Biased source, I know, but I'm inclined to believe her. —[[User:EllieMurasaki|EllieMurasaki]] 03:37, 7 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| − | : I'm not taking sides here | + | : I'm not taking sides here but I want to avoid any controversy, and her posts on the website and LJ have been removed anyway.--[[User:Missyjack|Missyjack]] 05:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:08, 7 January 2011
removed link to 7 Jan spoilers as there is controversy over whether they were legitimately obtained. --Missyjack 03:20, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- According to the owner of supernaturallocations.com, KJ Neely, they were. Biased source, I know, but I'm inclined to believe her. —EllieMurasaki 03:37, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not taking sides here but I want to avoid any controversy, and her posts on the website and LJ have been removed anyway.--Missyjack 05:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
